top of page
IMG_3246 2 1.png
IMG_3252 1.png

We visited Chicago O'Hare International Airport and conducted on-site observations at the boarding gate throughout the day, analyzing passenger behaviors, interactions, and pain points during the boarding process.

WhatsApp Image 2025-02-10 at 15.01.47.jpeg
image 551.png

United Scan2Go

Improving group boarding for passengers traveling together

Team: Yuhan ke, Benedicta Gokah, Max Kurchitskiy, Bhairavi Ruparel 
Individual Contribution: UX Designer and Researcher 
Duration: August 2024 - December 2024 
Tools: Figma, Mural, and Google Suite 
Client: United Airlines 
Industry: Airline
Client: United Airlines 

Understanding Passenger and Gate Agent Experiences

Problem Space 

  • Many passengers experience pre-flight anxiety, with preparedness playing a key role in reducing stress.

  • Parents juggling bags, strollers, and children face overwhelming challenges, making security checks and boarding difficult.

  • The demanding pre-flight process often leaves travelers exhausted before they even reach the gate.

  • Families and friends assign roles to manage tasks, but coordinating responsibilities can still be challenging.

agent.png

"I have to verify and match as you board, they will hand me boarding passes for John Doe while Jane Doe is boarding. We get duplicate scans like that all the time!"

agent.png

"Usually I will go over here [station behind counter] and say show me who has been scanned in terms of time order so I can know who I missed."

The moment of truth is the interaction between passengers and the gate agent while boarding. 

Analysis and Synthesis 

While conducting observations and intercept interviews at Chicago O'Hare International Airport, we analyzed the boarding experiences of both gate agents and passengers. From our insights, we identified and categorized key findings into three distinct groups for each.

passenger.jpg
agent.png

1. Pre-Boarding Experience 
2. Group Dynamics 
3. Boarding Experience 

1. Staff Interactions
2. Errors and Multiple Scans 
3. Technology Implementation and Use 

6
 

Consequence Matrix

Which area of focus would have the greatest impact ?

A decision matrix is a decision-making tool that evaluates and prioritizes a list of options, starting with a list of weighted criteria established by the team based on initial conversations with the client, and then evaluating each option against those criteria.

Operational Efficiency 

Customer Experience 

Score 

Pre-Boarding Experience 

Group Dynamics 

Actual Boarding Experience 

Staff Interaction 

Errors and Multiple Scans 

Technology Implementation and Use 

1
 

2
 

3
 

4
 

2
 

2
 

3
 

2
 

1
 

5
 

2
 

3
 

3
 

3
 

5
 

2
 

3
 

Focus area with the greatest consequence/ impact on operational efficiency and customer experience.

First Principle Insight

When gate agents manually verify and process multiple documents and touchpoints while managing a continuous flow of passengers, errors tend to occur due to cognitive overload, divided attention, and accidental passenger errors.

Each year, millions of families and groups travel together, representing a substantial segment of United Airlines customer base.

Group 372.png
Group 369.png

20,000,000

Number of unique PNRs containing 2+ pax. both domestic and international for the year of 2024

20% Domestic

32% International 

January 2024 - August 2024 

Group 370.png
Group 371.png

Data provided by United Airlines 

Our target audience consists of these three categories:

  • Parents with young children

  • Elder couples

  • Adults traveling with an elderly companion

group pass 1.jpg

Design Solutions  

Customer Experience Solution 

"How might we make a passenger's experience less stressful so they can have the right start to their vacation with their kids?"

iPhone 16 Pro Max.png
Component 3 (1).png
single pass 1.jpg

Proposed Solution: 
 

  • Offers group boarding pass option during online check-in.

  • Includes pre-confirmation step for user review and approval.

  • The toggle switch at the top facilitates movement between security modes, Pre-TSA and post-TSA.

  • Group boarding pass features clear annotations.

  • The number of passengers, names and seat information on the group boarding pass is clearly indicated.

​Potential Risks:

  1. Customer performing an additional step during a critical airport moment.

  2. Learning curve and user adoption.

These boarding passes reflect both single and group boarding passes

Read the screens in a clockwise order

Design Concept

Our design goal for the group boarding pass was to simplify the airport experience for groups. This drove our design decisions, ensuring users could visualize and access essential information with ease.

 

We prioritized key features such as: 

  1. Toggle Switch: Switch between TSA security mode and United Airlines group mode

  2. Number of people associated to the group code 

  3. Passenger seat numbers

  4. Identifiers for people in the group 

  5. Group QR code 

iPhone 15 Pro - White flatten.png

2

3

5

6

Initial concept

Potential Risk: 

A key challenge was the reliance on group arrivals. If one member canceled due to an emergency, it disrupted check-in and required adjustments for both the airline and remaining travelers.

Removing a Passenger from a Group Pass:

  • Initial Group Pass Access (Airport): Upon first access to the group pass, you are greeted with a welcome message. 

  • Passenger Selection: Use the "Edit" function to remove a selected passenger from the group.

  • Passenger Removal: Select the passenger who is unable to join and proceed with the removal.

  • Group Confirmation: Confirm the final number of people in the group.

  • Group Boarding Pass Acquisition: Obtain an updated group boarding pass.

airport page.jpg
remove page 3.jpg

Read the screens in a clockwise order

remove pg1 .jpg
remove pg 2.jpg

Gate Agent Interface 

"How might we reduce the number of possible failure points at the gate?"

  • Group Boarding Pass Scan: The gate agent scans the group boarding pass.

  • Booking Passenger Identification: The passenger under whose name the tickets were issued is identified.

  • Manual Passenger Verification: The gate agent manually verifies the presence of all passengers.

  • Group Boarding: The passengers board together.

Gate Agent Verification:

  • Enhanced Accuracy through Deliberate Confirmation: The design uses visual cues and selection requirements to ensure accurate passenger verification, balancing speed with accuracy.

  • Improved Agent-Passenger Interaction: These visual and selection features prevent accidental actions and promote deliberate confirmation, leading to more interaction between the gate agent and passengers.

Group 634345.jpg
selective 1.jpg
Group 634356.png
Group 634357.jpg

Primary Research 

Chicago O'Hare International Airport Site Observations 

To gain insights into United Airlines' current group boarding process, we conducted observations at O'Hare Airport with the United Airlines team to identify the pain points and behaviors of both gate agents and passengers. Our research utilized methods such as the AEIOU framework to organize observations, along with intercept interviews with passengers and gate agents to understand their experiences and workflows.

Observed complete gate

boarding process `

5 Gates

Passengers preferred digital passes over paper passes

83%

Time taken by a family in boarding group 5 to transition from the waiting area to the jet bridge

2:34 Mins

Key Insights 

IMG-20250210-WA0009.jpg

Prior to boarding, passengers perform various rituals to ease the anxiety when flying

There is unspoken social pressure experienced when boarding as 
a group

Errors are common, resulting from over-scanning or under-scanning boarding passes at the gate

01 

02 

03 

Contextual inquiry conducted with a gate agent

Process 

To validate the idea of a single-group boarding pass as a potential solution to streamline the boarding process, we conducted a simulation test after analyzing insights from our observations at the airport.

Using a classroom at the Institute of Design, we recreated an airport environment with foam-core structures and 3D-printed tools. These tests aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the new boarding pass compared to individual boarding passes; understand passenger's behavioral considerations and mainly determine the optimal group size for this solution to avoid overburdening passengers or gate agents.

Participants: 12- 15 

Duration: 45 Mins 

The simulation included two tests:

Controlled test reflecting the current boarding process.

Key Takeaways 

It is possible to reduce the boarding time of a group by 46% through implementation of a single group boarding pass.

Test A 

01 

Operational Impact 

Solution test implementing our proposed single-group boarding pass 

Test B

Simulation 

IMG_7783 1.png

The classroom simulation setup

Fail-Safe Approach

02 

A mechanism is needed to handle boarding for groups that are unexpectedly split due to no-shows or delayed arrivals.

Group Pass Limit

03 

We hypothesize that boarding becomes less efficient when =<5 people share a single PNR.

iPhone 15 Pro - White flatten.png

User Testing 

Following the simulation, we conducted semi-structured user interviews to assess the usability and context of our proposed design. The same user interfaces from the simulation (Tests A and B) were used. 

Participants: 10 

Duration: 25 mins Per Participant 

Key Insights From Users

UI, Features and Usability

“Toggle feature is efficient and makes sense to me."

Somehow make Pre-TSA and Post-TSA more clear, currently its not”

01

“ When it gets to the pop-up to opt in, that process isn’t so smooth. I didn’t know how to get there."
“Also opting in at the airport seems like an extra step especially when you are constantly bombarded at the airport.”

“Also If I opt in, do I get something from it?”

02

“The blue is overpowering the grey so a different color for toggle - highlight it.”

03

“I think the opting into group boarding should happen when people purchase their tickets rather than at the airport. To me that is the most advantageous point to introduce this features. Its always one more thing at the airport and I do not like that”

06

“I would have used this with my fiancé whilst traveling. We always juggle a lot of bags between us when boarding. With this feature, we can delegate who handles the bags and who boards us in”

05

“Its a nice to have for people traveling in groups, but its a necessity for families. I see the use case more for people with some level of familiarity with each other”

04

Screenshot 2025-02-10 at 4.18.46 PM.png

Solution Interface

Controlled Interface

Value Proposition 

With Scan2Go, we are confident we can reduce error rates in group boarding, allowing gate agents to dedicate more time and energy to personal interactions with passengers. We believe that improving the boarding experience for millions of passengers will not only increase operational efficiency but also enhance overall Customer Experience (CX) scores for United Airlines.

Error rate for group boarding 

User Experience 

Personalized Interactions

Operational Efficiency 

This project involved rapid client debriefs, problem reframing, risk analysis, and prototyping, offering insights into strategic airline operations.

  • Comprehensive Solutions – Observations revealed the importance of agent-facing aspects, leading to their integration.

  • Defining the Core Problem – Identifying key pain points and their impact is crucial.

  • Quick Usability Testing – Immediate feedback refined the solution and provided fresh perspectives.

  • Collaboration & Stakeholder Engagement – Aligning solutions with business goals, security regulations, and user needs.

Takeaways

passenger.jpg

"I know we are boarding soon, but I feel so anxious!"

passenger.jpg

"We do not travel with paper passes. We avoid that at all costs. The children always want to scan their own passes at the gate. The last time we did that, one lost his pass and the other got wet

passenger.jpg

"We have no issue with the boarding process. The only challenge boarding with 3 children is the unspoken pressure of others in the line wanting you to hurry up."

bottom of page